tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8692381608294018617.post1420679630572922143..comments2023-11-05T07:27:43.837-05:00Comments on Narrative and Technology: final projectAdamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16302919444091859459noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8692381608294018617.post-66537364975225682682009-04-10T21:11:00.000-04:002009-04-10T21:11:00.000-04:00First question - what are you *doing* with the Bli...First question - what are you *doing* with the Blinkey quote. Do you agree with him? Differ with him? It's an interesting quote, but I'm unsure of your direction with it.<BR/><BR/>I like the beginning of the second paragraph - essentially you're claiming that images were never authentic, and maybe even that the authenticity or trustworthiness of image was an illusion. Sounds good - but at the end of the paragraph I'm completely unsure of how that leads into a project. By the end of the paragraph, it seems like your argument is simply that HOL is fiction - which is obvious, and reductive, and clearly not what you intend, but that's what I get here.<BR/><BR/>What's your argument? I assume you're trying to demonstrate a certain continuity between "raw" and "digital" imaging - but what, exactly?Adam Johnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11588769281227456640noreply@blogger.com