tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8692381608294018617.post3254461894868676829..comments2023-11-05T07:27:43.837-05:00Comments on Narrative and Technology: Midterm, Option IIAdamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16302919444091859459noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8692381608294018617.post-43861617266995964912009-02-28T12:50:00.000-05:002009-02-28T12:50:00.000-05:00You would have benefited from a draft here. This ...You would have benefited from a draft here. This is not at all a coherent essay - there are several candidates for the argument (I believe your real argument is at the end, but that's arguably a matter of opinion), and it isn't structured as an essay - that is, as a series of points (and/or pieces of evidence) which demonstrate your argument.<BR/><BR/>Why are you dealing with Taylorism? Why do you consider Tabula Rasa (not widely accepted among scientists these days!) to be either legitimate or relevant? Why do you consider the advance of Taylorism to be inevitable? There are ideas here, but presented in such a scattered and brief way (this is less than half the minimum length) that they don't add up to anything like a coherent argument.Adam Johnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11588769281227456640noreply@blogger.com