tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8692381608294018617.post5786210036282615533..comments2023-11-05T07:27:43.837-05:00Comments on Narrative and Technology: Subvert Command and Control (option 2)Adamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16302919444091859459noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8692381608294018617.post-81294702690646695612008-10-28T15:29:00.000-04:002008-10-28T15:29:00.000-04:00The spelling errors are scanning/digitizing errors...The spelling errors are scanning/digitizing errors, which helps explain them. Funny line about robots, by the way.<BR/><BR/>You should have cited your (flawed, if only because so incomplete) information on Haraway's background. When you do research, you *need* to cite it. Again, you should have cited your source re: "phallogocentric"<BR/><BR/>"Feminist cyborg literally means a hybrid advocate for equality for women." Really? Why didn't you explain this? <BR/><BR/>Short version: You get a very slow start, and you picked a perhaps unnecessarily long passage. Your discussion of her terms is quite good, and detailed. Your last paragraph is a dismissal of Haraway, not an engagement with her, though - you aren't thinking things through at all. I'm not saying that you need to like Haraway - but doing this particular prompt demanded taking her seriously, and assuming that her difficulty has some sort of real reason behind it. This still isn't exactly bad work - you handle her terminology well - but you're ignoring the most interesting part of the prompt.Adam Johnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11588769281227456640noreply@blogger.com