tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8692381608294018617.post833965913690552379..comments2023-11-05T07:27:43.837-05:00Comments on Narrative and Technology: Final Project Proposal - Taylor HochuliAdamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16302919444091859459noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8692381608294018617.post-13907725089586522852013-04-18T17:05:03.272-04:002013-04-18T17:05:03.272-04:00Overview - good, although most of these works shou...Overview - good, although most of these works should be refered to briefly, if at all, in the essay/presentation itself. <br /><br />Argument - One way you could word this is that Marcuse is essentially correct: apparent oppositional figures in our current cultural/artistic moment do not function as an authentic opposition. Or, if you *don't* quite agree with Marcuse, you could use whatever you (possibly subtle) points of disagreement are to make your argument more precise.<br /><br />Possible counter-argument counter-argument: You are conflating terrorism with antagonism. While that's not obviously wrong, it's also not obviously right - you need to think through what you're trying to do here carefully, and express it clearly.<br /><br />Connection to Marcuse - this is fine, of course, though you want to look at the specifics of what he has to say about antagonists.<br /><br />Medium - I'm not opposed to anything you want to do here, but I think that using a visual element to supplement rather than replace an essay is the more obvious choice. Obvious isn't always the same as better, of course, so do as you like - that's just my default suggestion.<br /><br />Looks good!Adamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16302919444091859459noreply@blogger.com