Dreyfus’ On the Internet stresses the importance of embodiment, as well as
the risks of disembodiment in a future with increasingly present technological
advances. Through the story of Case in Neuromancer,
I believe that William Gibson also stresses the same arguments that Dreyfus
presents. In order for true learning to take place, one must be physically
present and take risks in learning.
Case used to be known as one of the
greatest data thieves in the Matrix until his ex-employer poisoned his nervous
system with a mycotoxin. [Gibson back page summary] It is alluded to in the
book, but Case clearly got his abilities by learning from people who already
knew how to jack into the Matrix. He was personally taught by McCoy Pauley aka
Dixie Flatline. [Gibson p. 49] “He’d spent most of his nineteenth summer in the
Gentleman Loser, nursing expensive beers and watching the cowboys. He’d never
touched a deck, then, but he knew what he wanted. There were at least twenty
other hopefuls ghosting the Loser, that summer, each one bent on working joeboy
for some cowboy. No other way to learn.” [Gibson p. 77] Case was Pauley’s
joeboy, or sort of an apprentice, as I understand it. Case only became on the
greatest data thieves of all time by learning from someone who was already
proficient in that field. This is just like Dreyfus’ argument in the entire
second chapter. He describes six stages of how a student learns and how the
student can reach each stage. The first three levels: novice, advanced
beginner, and competence can be reached with distance learning. However,
proficiency, expertise, and mastery can only be reached with an embodied
presence. [Dreyfus chapter 2] Without the guidance of Pauley, Case could only
become competent, and follow sets of rules, even when there might be exceptions
which would yield better outcomes.
To go along with this idea, the
risk of embodied learning is what truly allows for real growth and advancement.
For example, a student could face the risk of proposing and defending an idea
while a teacher could be asked a question and risk not knowing the answer.
[Dreyfus p. 33] It is this inherent risk of embodied learning that leads to
emotional involvement in the topic. It might seem as though emotional
detachment is the best way to go about mastering something by not letting gut
feeling interfere with facts or statistical advantages, the opposite was found
to be true in a study of nurses in each stage of skill acquisition. [Dreyfus p.
32] Even though Case is jacked into the Matrix, his physical body can still be
affected by his actions. This is seen when he takes the risk of taking a pass
by the AI Wintermute. [Gibson p. 115] The AI catches him and Case’s physical
body flatlines for a while. In the meantime, Wintermute is generating a
dreamlike state for Case based on his memories through the simstim unit that
was wired into his deck. After briefly encountering Linda in the arcade, Case
spoke with Wintermute (embodied by Julius Deane) and Case ends up shooting it
in the head. This encounter with the AI really affected Case and although he
knows that he didn’t actually kill Deane, “Deane’s death kept turning up like a
bad card.” [Gibson p. 125]. He also has a feeling that Deane might have killed
Linda on Wintermute’s orders. I think it is his emotional connection to these
people that make him learn from this encounter and be able to complete the even
more difficult tasks ahead of him that Armitage/Corto assigns him.
1 comment:
Your introduction doesn't say much.
The next two paragraphs are filled with quotations - this is, in short, a very brief essay. That's not entirely a bad thing, because you accomplish something. You make a precise, focused argument (even if poorly introduced) that Case's learning is, counterintuitively, embodied rather than disembodied.
That makes this fine for a rough draft, because you turn extreme brevity into something of a virtue, because you're focused. So if you revise, what should you do?
Clearly what's missing here is an analysis of what it *means*. How does it change our understanding of the novel if we use Dreyfus to argue that Case is, in a sense, just as embodied (more embodied? would you go that far?) than he is in the ordinary world. Why does it matter and what does it mean that cyberspace is more physical and less virtual than it might seem to be? The most obvious way of answering this question, if you choose to do so, is through a detailed reading of Case's various flatlinining experiences when encountering Wintermute...
Post a Comment