In Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, the Earth’s population now has hover cars, mechanized animals, and the ability to emigrate to other planets. On Earth, the people live relatively akin to our time, they go to work; they try to have relationships, but there is one major exception. Almost all of the characters own an animal and many own multiple animals. This doesn’t seem odd at first until the reader realizes that the bigger stock animals are always desired by the population. Also, the main character is a bounty hunter who destroys androids on the planet Earth; androids that could be beneficial. This can be partially explained by Marcuse in his book, One Dimensional Man, which states, “The intensity, satisfaction, and even the character of human needs, beyond the biological, have always been preconditioned” (1). This can be understood to mean that all levels of needs have already been ingrained by the general population. By looking at the desire for animals, the destruction of androids and comprehending the quote from Marcuse, we can understand how the government and general populace have created this need.
It should first be noted that the government first created the need for the general populace to have animals. When Rick and his neighbor are speaking in chapter one, the neighbor mentions, “how people are not taking care of an animal… it’s not a crime like it was right after WWT, but the feeling’s still there” (p.13). This created the original desire for an animal, because although the punishment was never stated, it can be implied that the punishment for not owning an animal was rather terrible. From wartime, it has now gone into a full obsession and a mark of prosperity on Earth. At the Rosen Corporation Rick is amazed at all of the animals that the company owns, however, once Rick realizes that their rarest animal, the owl, “is artificial. There are no owls” (p. 53). The company loses part of its value to Rick. The intense desire to own an animal and that satisfaction that happens from it all originate from laws in the past that were strongly enforced by the government.
There is also another new business on Earth, the destruction of androids. Androids are not supposed to be on Earth. Many citizens do not know of their existence as noted in chapter twelve, “Other humans, having no knowledge of the presence of androids amongst them, had to be protected at all costs- even at losing the quarry” (p. 108). This also seems odd, the androids, when not threatened, just try and live out seemingly human lives. They become police officers, singers, and other members of the community. However, these mechanical beings are not supposed to be on Earth, they are free slaves for the people who have decided to emigrate to another planet and are a major incentive to travel that distance. Those that do not travel to another planet to live on a colony are deprived of these robot slaves, but the robots are escaping these planets and are trying to live a new life. The government does not appreciate that and are willing to spend resources into making sure that the humans that are still on Earth do not have access to such robots Rick’s boss even states, “W.P.O. [world police organization] is enough interested in the new Nexus 6 that they want a man of theirs to be with you” (p.72). The government’s wish for androids to only be on the new planets is why Rick has such a strong determination to eradicate these robots from the planet.
From Marcuse, we can understand that conditioned responses drive most of the non-biological human needs that we see in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. The need for animals is now driven by the general populace, but beforehand it was directed by the government and the major reason that androids are destroyed on Earth is that the government does not want them to exist on the planet because they are only supposed to be the slaves of the people who have decided to emigrate. So just as it is described in The One Dimensional Man, the majority of the society ha wants that are akin to the agenda of its government.
Thursday, January 31, 2013
The Government Wants You to Want Things - prompt 1- Karen Knutson
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I like where your argument is going, but I think some of the support gotten from the book is not entirely correct. With the quote in the second paragraph about not taking care of animals being a punishable offense, i do not think the character was saying that the government required every individual to own an animal. I think it meant that owning a living animal, and then not keeping it healthy causing it to die prematurely was once a punishable offense, considering the rarity of animals at that time especially. Also, in the third paragraph you mention how the government does not want androids on earth even though they are living peacefully, but I believe it was stated in the book that androids who emigrated to earth were one's that escaped the colonies by killing their owners.
Other than some misinterpreted support, I like how you are saying that what the government desires influences what the people making up the society desires.
Ideally, you'd trim out the element of summary in the first paragraph, and add detail to the argument - not only can we read PKD through Marcuse (which we do argue), but we *should* (which we don't).
In the second paragraph, you could do more with the war - for instance, the fact that the government that waged the war is now trying to reinforce the value of the animal life that it (nearly) annihilated. If you're interested in the complexity of the government's role here, that seems central...
I think you could do more with the government's motivations re: the androids, at least after having read the whole novel. For instance, the fact that the androids are fleeing *to* a desolate wasteland is important and revealing...
You clearly understand the connection between external, governmental needs and inner, personal needs in the novel. That's a good start - but what does that connection *mean*? Why does it matter? Does it make Marcuse your valid? Does it *change* our reading of PKD? What does this connection do for you, or us? Answering that question is how you get a complete argument.
Janine's objections are correct, incidentally...
Post a Comment