Characters can give great insight into the themes of
the story or a message that the author wants to convey. In the first half of Frankenstein,
Mary Shelley uses Robert Walton as a character that can give great insight into
what the novel may mean.
The first
theme of the story that I think Shelley might be trying to convey through
Walton is the danger of blind pursuit of knowledge. By also making Walton’s
journey similar to the beginning of Victor Frankenstein’s, we can also learn
even more about this theme. Walton started off as a young boy without a proper
education but a thirst for reading. He “had read with ardour the accounts of
the various voyages which have been made in the prospect of arriving at the
North Pacific Ocean through the seas which surround the pole” as well as many
other books about voyages of discovery. He temporarily abandoned this pursuit
when he learned his father’s dying wish was that he did not pursue a seafaring
life, however, after inheriting his cousin’s fortune, he set off on his passion
for discovery. His own voyage was one to discover a passage to the North Pole
and hopefully learn about the secrets of the magnet (magnetic field of the
earth) and had dedicated 6 years of his life in order to undertake such a
voyage. It seems as though Walton was fixated on this one goal of his, much
like Victor was in his pursuit of creating life. By only considering his end
goal of the glory of discovery, he was ignoring the potential peril he might
face on such a rigorous journey. He actually does encounter danger when his
ships gets stuck between sheets of ice and he must make decisions that could
potentially harm himself and his crew. This consideration of the consequences
of actions is especially important to today’s society when reflecting upon the
article from Bill Joy. It might be incredible to discover some new and amazing
knowledge but that alone is not necessarily a good reason to pursue that
technology. As Victor sums up later in the book, “A human being in perfection
ought always to preserve a calm and peaceful mind, and never allow passion or a
transitory desire to disturb his tranquility.” To me, this means that one
should try to look at both sides of any endeavor in order to make an informed
decision rather than blindly pursue new knowledge.
The
second theme that I think Walton may represent is the value of communication.
Through his letters to his sister, Walton longs for a friend that he thinks he
will never find on his journey to the north. He wants someone who he can share
his thoughts and feelings with other than just his crew on the ship. When
Victor is finally brought onto the ship and he gets to know him more, Walton
begins to think of him as a friend. This is an important turning point for
Walton because previously, his journey had been long and lonely and he was glad
to have someone that he regarded as a friend. It gave him a renewed sense of
purpose to complete his mission. Walton seems, at this point, be in contrast
with Victor in this case. Walton gains a friend in the middle of his journey
whereas Victor only met up with Clerval after his “journey” of creating life
was complete. From reading the first half of the book, we can see that Victor’s
pursuit of knowledge led to disastrous consequences so perhaps the influence of
a friend before his dangerous journey is completed will sway him to keep a
clear mind.
1 comment:
Your first paragraph doesn't actually do anything beyond restating the prompt. You want to begin with *your* argument (sometimes in a first draft that argument is a little fuzzy, but you still want to start there, no matter how imperfectly).
Re: the second paragraph, consider this line: "To me, this means that one should try to look at both sides of any endeavor in order to make an informed decision rather than blindly pursue new knowledge." Here, you're beginning to develop an argument. What I'd like to see, though, is a version which articulates not that an other side exists, but that deals with what it *is*. Is the opposition to the pursuit of knowledge purely negative, or does it represent some positive set of values? In other words, what is the alternative to Walton (or the alternative version of Walton, if you prefer) really like?
Your second theme is less obvious, and less developed. I also think it's more interesting, for what it's worth - maybe because Victor fails to communicate so dramatically in the rest of the novel, whereas Walton communicates far more, no matter how imperfectly.
If you revise, you should either focus on one of the two themes, or you should explore the two themes more in connection with each other. I like the second much better, but you've also done less with it - revising around the second theme would really be essentially starting a whole new essay. Don't think of that as a bad thing, though - it's an opportunity, because you'd be starting with what seems to me to be a clear and interesting idea.
Post a Comment