The graphic Novel Jimmy Corrigan: The
Smartest Kid On Earth is complex reading and could easily be read multiple
times from different perspectives. One way to read this novel is in light of
Jimmy's contradictory relationships with his mother. By piecing together and
observing Jimmy's relationship with his mother, the reader can get a glimpse as
to why Jimmy is the way he is and use this as a lens to analyze just about the
whole novel. It is the duality of pushing away and using her as a safety net
that defines Jimmy.
It is important to note here that although
the image is blue, the man appears to be the superman actor who took advantage
of Jimmy’s mom in the first scene of the novel. The reader should also quickly
note that a boy of that age would likely be with his mother so this likely
foreshadows how protective Jimmy is of his mother which helps us read some of
the scenes with his father and further complicates his overall avoidance of his
mother in the nursing home. Jimmy's mother is also very controlling of his life
and this scene seems to give us the impression that Jimmy would kill his very
hero to protect her, at least early on in his life. This aids us in our
understanding of why he avoids his mother's constant attempts to call him and
tell him what to do but also his utter inability to function without her. It is
that conundrum that will come to define Jimmy in this novel. The fact that this
image appears so early in the novel, it is easy to assume that this was Jimmy's
first experience with his mother's love life. However, the way this is
presented, as a banner introducing the rest of the novel, it is not unexpected
that this will not be the last time (14)[1].
Indeed, Ware goes on to give us other
examples of his mother's quest for love and young Jimmy's reaction. While his
father is discussing the impending Thanksgiving holiday, Jimmy remembers two
past Thanksgivings, one when he was young, and one more recent. In series, we
see Jimmy talking to his mother on the phone about perhaps missing Thanksgiving
with her and also a remembrance of something that happened over Thanksgiving
dinner years ago. The scene of the recent Thanksgiving, represented only by the
image of a phone and Jimmy's words, furthers the idea that although Jimmy
cannot seem to function without his mother, he also has an urge to break free
of her altogether, making up excuses not to spend the holiday with her but
finally offering a tentative concession to please her. The other scene embedded
here is one of a young Jimmy asking “who was that man...?” referring to yet
another one of his mother's failed love interests. The ensuing crying keeps
Jimmy awake that night. Below this scene is a picture of a photographer trying
to capture Jimmy and his mother and Jimmy trying to pull his mother away. Taken
separately, this may just be viewed as a child that doesn't want to have his
picture taken. However, in light of the information before and surrounding it,
it is clearly a very scared boy trying to keep his mother away from a man that
may hurt her and cause another night of crying. The man is probably very well
just trying to take a photograph at the mother's request, but at this point,
the young boy cannot separate men, his mother, and crying (Ware, 116). Jimmy is
quite clearly not “tolerating” the recognition of his Mother’s sexual side
because he sees it causing her pain.
Jimmy Corrigan, because of these
experiences, is a walking contradiction. On one hand, we see that he is very
protective of his mother and doesn't want to see her get hurt. However, we also
see evidence that he believes he has failed to protect his mother from the men
who cause her to stay awake at night crying. This gives Jimmy a double dose of
inferiority complex. Dose 1: He couldn't protect his mother from men and their
ways and is therefore unworthy of love himself and Dose 2: He is a man and
can't separate himself from the types of men his mother attracts. These two
conclusions cause Jimmy to want to strike out on his own, so to speak, and push
his mother away as the wellspring of these feelings. Despite all of this, she
is still his safe place. We see this when Jimmy is having a minor crisis in a
diner with his father and sneaks off to a pay phone to call his mom (176). So
he doesn't want men to hurt his mother, and he also doesn't want to lose his safe
place. However, he still pushes her away whenever possible. So let's examine
how this manifests itself in the novel.
The first woman we see Jimmy interact with
other than his mother is Peggy, the mail clerk at his workplace. First, we're
given a view
of Jimmy's fantasy,
sitting by a fire with Peggy in pure bliss. Following it though, is the actual
reality that she barely recognizes his existence and when she does, it is in an
air of annoyance (13). Jimmy calls her once, before he leaves town, to get his
mail which is of course silly because that is her job (21). Looking at this
scene in light of his inferiority complex, it is easy to see why Jimmy makes no
move and even seems to accept the harsh treatment from Peggy. He's a man after
all and she is probably just protecting herself. Beyond that, he does not talk
to Peggy at work, or at least that we know of, he simply day dreams about her.
When he does finally strike up enough courage to talk to her, it is by phone.
We see Jimmy on the phone with exactly 3 parties: The airline, Peggy, and his
mother. There is no doubt he chose to call her to keep his distance, the same
way he stays distant from his mother. He also prefaces the call with his mail
at work, a further safety net. He is at least trying to grow beyond his
dependence on his mother, but he's still doing it with his mother in mind,
distance and safety.
These are just a few examples. In fact, the
whole book is full of examples of how Jimmy's Mom pervades every second of his
life. She is at once his lifeline and safety blanket and the bane of his
existence.
Works Cited:
Britton, Ronald, Michael
Feldman, and Edna Shaughnessy. The Oedipus complex today clinical
implications. London: Karnac Books, 1989. eBook.
Spavento, Elizabeth "Exploring the
Nature of Individual Identity in Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying and Ware’s Jimmy
Corrigan: The
Smartest
Kid on Earth," The Oswald Review: An International Journal of
Undergraduate Research and Criticism in the Discipline of English:
Vol.
9: Iss. 1, Article 5.
Available
at: http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/tor/vol9/iss1/5
Ware,
Chris. Jimmy Corrigan, the Smartest
Kid on Earth. New York City: Pantheon Books, 2000. Print.
1 comment:
The idea in the first paragraph is good. For it to really be an excellent argument, though, I think there'd need to be a claim developing *from* that idea of pushing away / hiding behind.
The 2nd paragraph is good. One thing I'm noticing for the first time his how his mother turns away from the violence - how should we understand that? Is that turning away part of the fantasy itself? Or is it just really ingrained into how he understands his relationship with her?
Your extended discussion of the various thanksgivings is basically good. I would have liked a more coherent preparation for this material, ideally in the introduction. I also think that your analysis isn't even close to exhaustive (what about the car ride to the restaurant at thanksgiving as a child?) which goes to show that it has substantial merit. I'd like to have seen more discussion of Thanksgiving-as-Thanksgiving here, too - the absence of a stable romantic/sexual connection leads to an absence of the family Thanskgiving...
Re: your good analysis of his fantasy of skinning his father, one thing you're moving towards is making explicit the connection between his mother's sexuality and the ongoing themes of violent retribution through the book - but curiously Superman is both the agent of violent retribution in our cultural fantasies and the *object* of that violent retribution in your initial scene. I'd like to see you bring all of that together.
"Jimmy Corrigan, because of these experiences, is a walking contradiction." - good paragraph.
Your closing paragraphs, explaining the consequences of his inferiority complex, are perfectly good. For my part, I would have preferred a return to superman - since you're on the edge of addressing the paradox of superman as savior and object of revenge. *However*, my preferences doesn't mean that you haven't done well. This is well organized, well argued, with a good dose of research. It's also a large jump ahead of the previous drafts.
Post a Comment