Polarizing Gender Domination
of House of Leaves and “Haunted”
Listening to the
Goth-Pop album “Haunted” by Poe offered a polarizing voice to the voices of House of Leaves: a dominant feminine voice. From primary
reading of House of Leaves, my
reaction to the voice of Johnny was the only experience I had of awareness to
the dominant male voice. But the foiling, powerful, and characteristically
female voice of “Haunted” brought greater attention to the relentless masculine-centric
plot and feeling of House of Leaves.
The dominant
male of House of Leaves begins with
Johnny and his friend Lude (notice the name). The pair spends their leisure
time “chasing tail” with extremely demeaning methods. The voice of the
narrator, Johnny, inserts stories related to Zampano’s writing; stories which
are nearly invariably about conquest of some woman. The only features Johnny
ever acknowledges about a woman are their genitalia and, occasionally, some
other physical feature. His deepest infatuation is with a stripper. He
recklessly flirts and sleeps with married, engaged, and dating woman, and
offers nothing more to them. But this is only Johnny’s hobby, because his main
occupation lies in the devotion to the tales and stories of men: compiling and interpreting Zampano’s writings
of the Navidson Record. Both of which
are stories of men on conquest of knowledge, meanwhile using women in the
effort, without paying much mind to them. Zampano, though in a less obvious way
than Johnny, is using women to satisfy a need of his as well as in effort to
discover understanding of the Navidson
Record. Johnny informs us of the numerous female guests he had to read
literature for him. “Exhibit B, Bits” is vital in a deeper understanding of Zampano’s
relationship with these women. The editors inform us that a number of these
brief passages are “written by someone else,” possibly one of his female
visitors (Danielewski, 542). Bit [J] on
page 545 reveals how Zampano treats the women:
“Goddamn!... Yes, of course write it down! Write down all of it down!
Everything I say!.... Goddamn her wrong!” This conveniently displays that
Zampano is both using a woman, and abusing her to write his masculine reflection
through the Navidson Record. This is
emphasized further by Bit [H], where he not so subtly calls his female ghost
writer garbage. And in his account of the Navidson
Record he occasionally viciously demeans the sole female character, Karen.
She is carefully portrayed as an unsupportive, insubordinate, adulterous wife.
This is in contrast to the sympathy with which Navidson is portrayed as he disregards
his wife’s wishes in order to pursue the knowledge of the hallway. Navidson’s
relationship with Karen is equivalent to the relationship Zampano and Johnny
have with women: satisfying a need, but
rejecting attachment in order to continue pursuing knowledge of his respective
labyrinth. Zampano is also sure to include detailed discussion on the nobility
of defeating a mutiny, justifying Navidson’s pursuit into the hallway. The
three male voices each echo and justify the oppression and objectification of
women while in the midst of their respective investigations.
But as dominant
as House of Leaves portrays the male
voice, “Haunted” foils this with a female voice, both in the literal voice of
Poe and in the subject matter of the album. The album, released nearly
simultaneously, echoes House of Leaves,
but with a slightly different meaning. This echo is solidified literally by one
Bit with the phrase “Bada-Bing, Bada-Bang, Bada-Gone!” (544) which is responded
with the “Bada-papa” background of the track “Haunted” and elsewhere through
the album. But the echo that responds is a feminine telling of the narrative,
with examples like “Spanish Doll” which could be understood as the effect of a
man using and abandoning a woman, voiced through a woman. This sentiment is
hardly representative of the album as a whole, which is emphatically supportive
of woman mutiny, feminine control, and gender role reversal. Track “Walk the
Walk” is evidence of this. It has definite feel of country music, a genre
fairly dominated by the male voice, and focuses on woman independence from male
control. The female voice attempts to inspire women (evidence by the call of
“Hey everybody”) to “walk to the beat of [their] own drum” (Poe). Tracks like
“Control” reveal the intent of a female voice taking over dominance and has a
distinct feeling of carefully executed aggression. While in tracks like “Hey
Pretty” and “Not a Virgin” focus on a gender role reversal with female voice in
the position of dominance demeaning and controlling a man. The female voice in
“Hey Pretty” is driving the car, typically the man’s role as the driver is in
control, and addressing her, presumably male companion as pretty. In “Not a
Virgin,” the feminine narrator is relatively proud and boastful about her
sexual prowess. With the male background literally suppressed in volume, she
asserts her dominance over the man with cockiness in her demand of hearing a
true story. Poe repetitively focuses on feminine power to the same extent the House of Leaves focus on masculine
exploits.
While Mark
Danielewski is not likely a supporter of a male-dominated society, House of Leaves is representative of
that sentiment. Because he and Poe are siblings, and the two works were
released nearly simultaneously, must be considered reasonably as two voices
telling the same tale, but with different perspectives. The polarization
between the two works about the dominant gender helps to enlighten the fact
that each is indeed dominated by a gender. The concluding track of “Haunted,”
“If You Were Here” appears to be a resolution between the female voice and the
male voice. Because the album echoes the story of House of Leaves, and I have not completed the book, the track may
be foreshadowing a similar resolution between the voices of genders in House of Leaves as well.
2 comments:
Your argument has a lot to offer, and you clearly have a lot of examples to support it. Though my first reaction to the album wasn't concentrated on the female dominance, your analysis of it clearly shows that that can be one lesson taken from it. You did a great job analyzing both the lyrics and the music in "Haunted", using many of the songs to support your thesis.
One thing I think you can expand on is Karen's role, especially after the discussion we had in class yesterday. You talk a lot about Johnny and a good amount about Zampano, but the argument about Navidson and Karen could be expanded. Just an idea, if you did want to expand this, you might want to talk more about how the feelings of Zampano are reflected through "The Navidson Record". I like the connection you made between his views and his story, and with expansion you could take this further.
You also connected the two well at the end. Your conclusion easily sums up all the points you have in your paper and adds something new. Overall, great job. Too bad we didn't have another revision before the final paper, because you could do great things by expanding this.
Good first paragraph - I wonder if it would be different after reading Karen's section of the novel, or if you would put it the same way? After all, this line of argument - "But this is only Johnny’s hobby, because his main occupation lies in the devotion to the tales and stories of men: compiling and interpreting Zampano’s writings of the Navidson Record. " - is going to be tempered at least a little bit (I think) when you read the sections of the book in which Karen's voice is stronger (not that we don't already have some sense of Karen from last week's reading).
I'm not totally sure that I buy your point of view on Zampano. However, you are presenting good evidence, and it may be my point of view that needs modification. Good use of the exhibits (which I'll need to review).
"Navidson’s relationship with Karen is equivalent to the relationship Zampano and Johnny have with women: satisfying a need, but rejecting attachment in order to continue pursuing knowledge of his respective labyrinth. " - I particularly liked that - good example of how to traverse the different layers of the narrative.
Your discussion of the album is very, very compressed. This could easily be developed into several paragraphs (one per song?). I also think that there are maybe ways in which you could/should be able to do more precise work to relate particular songs to particular passages in the text. That being said, you're already doing a lot in a short place.
This is probably your best work - it's almost too compact, but that's because you have a lot to say. This could readily be developed into something, say, three times longer.
Post a Comment