The
main argument Victor Frankenstein makes in the beginning of Frankenstein to Captain Robert Walton is
that the pursuit of knowledge is dangerous and not worth the immense sacrifices
it involves. However, by the end of the novel, Victor’s argument changes. This
change is because of Victor’s inability to assume responsibility for his
actions.
The majority
of Frankenstein is Victor’s retelling
of his tale to Robert. This occurs when Robert discloses to Victor the purpose
of his journey. He is traveling north in order to “discover the power of the
needle.” (Shelley 2), and he is subsequently willing to “sacrifice [his]
fortune, [his] existence, [his] every hope, to the furtherance of [his]
enterprise.” (Shelley 17). Upon hearing this, Victor grows angry with Robert
and says, “Let me reveal my tale, and you will dash the cup from your lips!”
(Shelley 17). Thus, the entire purpose of Victor’s narration is an attempt to
dissuade Robert from making the same mistakes that he did in his pursuit for
knowledge.
Victor
goes on to reiterate his stance at various points throughout the tale. While describing
the moment upon which he discovers the secret to life, he acknowledges Robert
saying that he can “see by [his] eagerness” (Shelley 48) that “[Robert] expects
to be informed of the secret with which [he is] acquainted.” (Shelley 48). Victor
refuses to disclose this knowledge to Robert, however, and instead urges him to,
“Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is
the acquirement of knowledge.” (Shelley 48). Furthermore, Victor reflects that
he does “not think that the pursuit of knowledge is an exception to this rule.”
(Shelley 51). The rule being “a human being… ought always preserve a calm and
peaceful mind.” (Shelley 51) – something Victor did not do in his pursuit for
the secret of life. After Victor completes his tale to Robert, Robert “endeavored
to gain from Frankenstein the particulars of his creature’s formation.” (Shelley
243). To which Victor scolds him saying, “Are you mad?” (Shelley 243), and that
Robert should “learn [Victor’s] miseries, and do not seek to increase [his]
own.” (Shelley 243).
At this
point, it appears that Victor is adamant in his argument. He has plainly repeatedly
warned Robert of the dangers of the pursuit of knowledge and has even gone
through the trouble of telling his entire story. Despite all this, Victor
changes his argument at the very end of the novel. Near the conclusion, Robert’s
crew give him an ultimatum—either they abandon the voyage or there will be a mutiny.
In response to this, Victor reproaches the crew. He tells them that their expedition
was glorious “not because the way was smooth and placid as a southern sea, but
because it was full of dangers and terrors.” (Shelley 248). He goes on to say that they were “hereafter
to be hailed as the benefactors of [their] species;” (Shelley 248) and that their
names would be adored because they “encountered death for honour and the
benefit of mankind.” (Shelley 248).
Victor said this in an attempt to convince the men to “be steady to
[their] purposes and be firm as a rock.” (Shelley 248). Admittedly, when I read
this part, I had to wonder if Victor was being serious. He had just spent around
two hundred pages trying to convince Robert to give up his voyage. Now with the
prospect of abandonment imminent, Victor changes his mind and urges them to
continue forward. Ultimately, the reason Victor contradicts his initial
argument is because he, himself, has not learned the lesson he was trying to
impress upon Robert.
Victor outlines many of his
mistakes throughout his account. The problem is that in many cases Victor fails
to take responsibility for said mistakes. Therefore, he doesn't learn from
them. For instance, instead of dealing with the fact he just created an
abomination, he “rushed out of the room, and continued a long time traversing [his]
bedchamber.” (Shelley 54). This ultimately results in the death of his youngest
brother and in the conviction of Justine. In regard to Justine, he is again
faced with a situation in which he should take responsibility for his actions
(or rather, inaction). Instead, he does little to save Justine. He reasons that
his “tale is not one to announce publicly” (Shelley 81), because it “would be
looked upon as madness” (Shelley 81). He further makes excuses for himself
saying, “a thousand times rather would I have confessed myself” (Shelley 83)
but that “such a declaration would have been considered as ravings of a madman.”
(Shelley 83). Rather than assume responsibility and attempt to save Justine’s
life, Victor is more concerned with how he will be perceived by others.
Later
on in his narrative, Victor seems to demonstrate that he is ready to assume some
sort of responsibility when he destroys the female monster he was creating.
However, he does not totally presume accountability for attempting to create
the second monster in the first place. He claims that he “had been struck
senseless by [the monster’s] fiendish threats” (Shelley 189) and that he “shuddered
to think that future ages might curse me.” (Shelley 189). Again, Victor appears
to be more concerned with the fact his actions will lead to him being perceived
negatively by others. Immediately following the destruction of the monster’s
companion, Victor does nothing to stop the monster after it threatens him.
Victor even admits to Robert, “Why had I not followed him?” (Shelley 192) and
that he “shuddered to think who might be the next victim.” (Shelley 192).
Instead of immediately pursuing the monster, Victor waits two days. Finally,
the monster’s threats culminate in Elizabeth’s murder. One which Victor claims
he could not stop because “the monster had blinded [Victor] to his real
intentions.” (Shelley 220).
After examining
Victor’s continuing failure to assume accountability coupled with his inaction
and excuse-making, it is no surprise he reverses his argument. In the end, it
is obvious that Victor was unable to learn from his mistakes. His inability to head
his own lessons ultimately costs him his life.
References
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Lynd Ward. Frankenstein: The Lynd Ward Illustrated Edition. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2009. Print.
2 comments:
Mark,
I like the argument you chose to analyze in your essay. I think it is an important part of the novel. You do a good job of examining the changes in Victor's argument in your first several paragraphs. However, your last two paragraphs stray a bit. Perhaps if you illustrate how Victor's inability to take responsibility relates to the change in his argument to Walton, warning him about the dangers of the pursuit of knowledge, it would help your essay flow better. Otherwise, I really liked your writing.
Becca
This essay is clear, straightforward, well argued and uses the text effectively. Hence, my main comments will be short. I don't think you do anything wrong that I can easily identify. I also thing that your effective use of one of Victor's asides to Walton was a very nice touch, and shows (in case it wasn't already clear) that you're paying great attention to details. So the fundamentals are all good.
I'm not going to say that you're *wrong* to say that the meaning of the contradiction is that Victor refuses to take responsibility. This is a perfectly reasonable approach, which addresses the specific question while keeping his character throughout the novel clearly in mind.
The think here that's really incomplete - and could use detailed attention if you revise - is the *specifics* of his refusal to take responsibility. If he refuses to take responsibility here, we should get some detailed evidence of that refusal not only in his earlier life but in his last few months.
My suggestion (if your revise) is to pay detailed attention to the post-Elizabeth section of the novel. Does he continue to show his earlier refusal to take responsibility in this material? Or is something else going on? Consider his fantasies of the presence of Elizabeth and Clerval; consider also his refusal to understand that the Monster, not "good spirits" are helping him across the arctic.
This is quite good, but the topic of responsibility, especially in the later parts of the novel, is only really started here - that part of the essay is more of a beginning than an ending (which is a good thing!).
Post a Comment