Science fiction puts an imaginative spin
on fact, but a major draw could be that it’s still conceivably relatable or so
far beyond previously established lines of thought that it is cool to think about
as an idea in general. William Gibson
does this in Neuromancer, on both
ends of the scale simultaneously, which makes it somewhat confusing, but also
stimulating. Part of science fiction,
according to Brain Aldiss, is the search for a definition of mankind, which
will stand in our confused state of knowledge. (Aldiss) In Neuromancer,
Gibson gives genetic surgeons the ability to, “re-set the code of his DNA,”
yielding a certain character, Julius Deane a life of one hundred and thirty
five years and counting, which would far surpass the oldest person to live in
modern times. (Gibson 12) With this vast
expanse of genetic engineering and modifications at the fingertips in which
metabolism, among other things, can be warped so easily leads to a picture of
humanity in the book of one singularity, which is manufactured. (Gibson 12)
This singularity is something that his humans share commonly, but the ironic
thing is that it isn’t a singularity at all, making it seem like there is no
unified humanity at all due to the vastness of imagination in genetic
variations, which would lead to copious amounts of individuals. Case’s original boss, Wage, is described as
having, “eyes that were vatgrown sea-green Nikon transplants,” some obscure
camera vision, and his crew having extremely large grafted muscles. (Gibson 21)
Molly has silver lens glasses, “surgically inset, sealing her sockets,” with, “ten
double-edged, four centimeter scalpel blades,” that slide form underneath her
nails like Wolverine. (Gibson 25) Case gets some of his nerves replaced and
some new organs (not very exciting considering organ transplants are normal in
modern society), but the surprising thing is the, “fifteen toxin sacs bonded to
the lining of various main arteries…dissolving…very slowly,” yielding a control
point for Armitage. (Gibson 46) Others
weren’t as nice, occurring as nasty pieces of elective surgery. (Gibson 59) The
fact that there is a seemingly unbound amount of genetic variation possible to
be chosen in large amounts of different combinations, elective or not, Gibson
gives a characteristic humanity of completely altered and unique qualities,
though most seem to be not too far from the imagination or even reality.
The society in Neuromancer is one of great capability and the indefinite,
destined, and partially undefined nature of it makes it all that more exciting
science fiction, where people are mostly free to choose various implants of any
variety, Mercedes cars can talk and hydrogen cell cars are primitive, and
working in zero gravity can be commonplace. (Gibson 90-105) If humanity has
options with people, then technology should be no different, which is a central
theme of the book, with work conducted in cyberspace via routes through the
matrix and deployments of different software for control, stealing, and grandiose
missions. This magnitude is hard to
fathom, much like the dream within a dream ventures of Inception, but phenomenally
fascinating. Brain Aldiss not only says
that science fiction is concerned with a definition of mankind, but also that
it is generally cast in a Gothic or post-Gothic picture. (Aldiss) This can be taken literally or figuratively,
both with a similar end result. Gothic
architecture is known for its cathedrals of unfathomable heights and boldness,
which had never been close to being introduced prior to that time’s architecture. (Flanagan) Similarly, the grandeur of the
variation of the humanity of Neuromancer,
whether it be physical genetic variations or the imagination for creation of
software and interaction of the matrix and cyberspace, previously untouched, is
like the height of the cathedrals or the details of the stained glass and
constructs of the massive flying buttresses, all central to Gothic
architecture. Conversely, different
countries rectified this Gothic character in various ways. England had a fascination with the grotesque
then vibrancy, Germany with dark, heavy figures, which was more
conservative. (Flanagan) Relative to the
novel, whether that be the repetition of metal, dark and black in Molly, the
negative of Armtiage’s team goal overall, “black iron deer rusted in the
gardens,” the plot and characters are science fiction in nature. (Gibson 98)
There are certain boundaries to the
science of humanity, like the biology of the body as a whole and the neurology
of the brain. The peculiar thing is that
continually it can be said that definite boundaries are obsolete. Imagination forms the idea, innovation the
vehicle, even SpongeBob can play around with this transforming a cardboard box into a
mountain climb rivaling Mt. Everest or a race surpassing the Indy 500 with
imagination. Oddly enough, imagination
is rooted in some means of pre-existing cause.
New ideas and conceptions, even such that of humanity, come from
somewhere, whether we know what that somewhere is. Gibson plays on this, bringing to light
possibilities and thoughts both similar and slightly altered to the definition of
science fiction by Brain Aldiss, some far beyond and some within the scope of what could be conceptualized. It is
because of this that science fiction like Neuromancer
can confuse and entice the mind cooperatively by challenging complacency with the
known in an expansive manner.
Works
Cited:
Aldiss,
Brian and David Wingrove. Trillion Year Spree: The History of Science Fiction.
London:
Victor-Gollancz Ltd., 1986. Page 26.
Flanagan,
Thomas. "The Gothic Era History." Stained Glass. N.p.. Web. 29 Jan
2014.
<http://riceflan.home.mindspring.com/The_Gothic_Era.html>.
Gibson,
William. Neuromancer. New York, NY: The Berkley Publishing Group, 1984. Print.
2 comments:
I really liked your essay, and thought it brought up good points that I didn’t think of. I wrote my essay on the same topic, but I didn’t consider the ability of less-active technology interacting with humanity (in your case, the Mercedes cars). I downplayed the idea of biological technology in the form of elective surgery, and thought your focus on that was very good. Secondly, you’re explanation for the Gothic nature of the book was very well done.
My one issue with the piece is that it strayed from the prompt. The prompt wanted you to support or refute Aldiss’s definition of “Science Fiction” using Neuromancer, rather than what you did, in saying Neuromancer takes the definition of Aldiss, and modulates it a bit. If you spent more time focusing on how the presence of strange and imaginative biotechnology must force reconsideration into the definition of humanity, or how technology changes how humanity interacts with one another.
This essay doesn't even vaguely follow the prompt. The assignment asks for you to argue *for or against* Aldiss' definition of science fiction. You make no attempt to do so. Even more problematically, you seem to have no particular argument at all. You have interests - for instance, you're interested in singularity (by which I think you mean individuality - they aren't the same thing!) in the novel, and how it relates to genetic engineering. This idea has potential, but it's hard to see where you're going with it.
Your understanding of the Gothic is random. It's not necessarily wrong, but not really focused on literature and what the gothic might have to do with Science Fiction.
In short: I have no idea what you're trying to argue, or why, and I have no idea what you think of the applicability of Aldiss to the novel. You bring up some interesting ideas, but with no clear strategy or focus.
Post a Comment