It becomes very obvious why The House of the Seven Gables by Nathaniel Hawthorne was selected as a piece of reading of this class. Through the first seven chapters, one can see several instances related to such things as narrative, technology, history and most of all change. Beings that this story is based during a time of tremendous change in the American world, one is able to observe many parallels between
"Endowed with common sense, as massive and hard as blocks of granite, fastened together by stern rigidity of purpose, as with iron clamps, he followed out his original design, probably without so much as imagining an objection to it, On the score of delicacy, or any scrupulousness which a finer sensibility might have taught him, the Colonel, like most of his breed and generation, was impenetrable."
These words describing the Colonel help us understand the first chapter of the book. We learn that his family has become forever cursed after his false accusations of witchcraft upon Matthew Maule. By building his house on the stolen land, the Colonel has eternally doomed his family. This idea of stubbornness to change is not only symbolic within the book but also helps the reader understand the time period that these characters are living in. Change came so rapidly at this time in history that it took most people by surprise, and many were hesitant to adjust.
In the real world today, people might experience a similar stubbornness or anxiety to change. Every person has their different reasons, some are probably more in depth than others but just like everything else in the world, it's all relative. Personally, I haven't experienced any life threatening curses like that of the Pyncheon family; however I did encounter a fairly important life change at a very young age.
As my final years of elementary school concluded, my life was great. Good friends, amazing family life, and not a worry in the world. That was until one day it all came crashing down. I had always looked up to my parents, thought they were the greatest people in the world, and that nothing could come between them. Wow, was I wrong. It was a few weeks after hearing them fight every night, that they told me the life changing news. They were getting divorced. I don't think words can describe the emotions that went through my mind for the next few days, so I won't even begin to try. More importantly, everything I ever knew was about to change. Did I want this to happen? Absolutely not. Did I have a choice. No. I fought and I fought to keep my lifestyle the same, clinging to the life I used to have. After months of depressed thoughts and sleepless nights, I finally realized that things would have to change forever.
I think it is a fair statement to say that most people like to be comfortable. Change usually fluctuates people's comforts zones. However, some changes are inevitable and have to be debt with accordingly. In the case of Colonel Pyncheon his refusal to change leads, to what most of us would agree on, a very harsh consequence for not only himself, but his entire family. Most changes in the real world today don't have those types of consequences, but none the less change is and will always be just around the corner.
Monday, September 1, 2008
Change is Inevitable
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
In regards to your story about your life, I felt like you explained much off the argument of your paper and needed to add more examples relating back to the Colonel. Why is it the same? How would the Colonel feel about your situation? Are there any examples in the book that show how the Colonel would act in a similar situation?
Also the line where you say, “We learn that his family has become forever cursed after his false accusations of witchcraft upon Matthew Maule. By building his house on the stolen land, the Colonel has eternally doomed his family.” And also the line “It becomes very obvious why The House of the Seven Gables by Nathaniel Hawthorne was selected as a piece of reading of this class.” This is something that I think needs to be cut. It was one of those things you wrote but should delete lines like the paper we proofread in class. Prof Johns said any summarization should be cut because you only have two pages to state your argument.
“Hawthorne's use of eerie language definitely lets the reader know that the Colonel's wrong doings will definitely . . .” Whenever you wrote this I felt like I needed an example of the eerie language that is definitely apparent. I thought to myself, as a reader of this paper, where is this language in this book?
I really liked your last paragraph I thought it brought the paper together and the last sentence really makes you think about change.
Your introductory paragraph isn't much more than a statement of the argument and an attempt to contextualize the book within this class. It's not a bad observation, actually, but it's of only dubious value within this paper.
Nice quote - for some reason I've never paid much attention to the language about *change* within it.
In the next couple paragraphs one important thing you don't do (but the assignment asks for) is demonstrate how/why we should take this passage as being *representative* within the book - you don't worry about removing it from its context, and you should.
As I think Kara hints, the material transitioning between the book and your life is a little long, a little vague, and doesn't really establish a firm connection between you & the Colonel. You're writing about difficult personal material, obviously - but if you're going to connect yourself with the Colonel, you could do it compellingly (*I'd* do it by pointing out that inside many sad young people is the intense desire to be able to impose one's will, like the Colonel is able to*).
Short version: great quote, and an interesting personal connection, but you don't make a strong connection between yourself and the Colonel, and you don't do a good job arguing that *this* quote about change (which you don't even explicitly discuss as a concept) is representative of the book as a whole.
Post a Comment