Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? was
written in 1968, around the peak of the Vietnam war. It may initially appear to
be somewhat of a stretch to say this novel is representative of the conflict,
but when you take into account Philip K. Dick’s anti-war attitude [1], it’s not
unfair to assume it in some way inspired his writing. Deckard could be seen as
a man involved in the conflict and undergoing a realization of the pointless
destruction of the war.
The
symbolism became apparent to me during the death of Luba Luft. Until then,
bounty hunters gauge their targets by testing their empathy levels, which is
the most accurate pre-mortem method of determining whether or not an entity is
human. With Luft, however, he encounters a problem—she responds to the
questions in an unexpected, emotional way. Deckard expects straightforward
answers as that’s what androids would typically expect a human to do, yet she
seems to genuinely believe he’s targeting her as an object to feed his
perversions. She behaves unexpectedly and humanly. She acts like more than a faceless
enemy, and it’s possible she is.
It’s here
that Deckard faces the conflict of being a soldier assigned a duty to kill
indiscriminately and being an empathetic human. While Deckard’s testing method
relies on proving the lack of empathy in androids, he realizes it’s not
necessarily a trait innate to humans. (Chapter 12, 85%). While Deckard didn’t
have much chance to formally test Luba, and Resch officially tested as human,
his gut feeling told him the opposite. Resch had no reservations in killing
Luba because he saw it as nothing more than a job, while Deckard had allowed
himself to establish a bond with the android, taking note of her very human
appreciation of art and her voice that was more alive and beautiful than any
human’s.
Phil Resch
can be seen as a soldier joining the war for the excitement of taking down a
supposed enemy. Resch has no qualms with the idea of using an android for sex
(Chapter 12, 95%) and killing them, much akin to the rampant rape and forced
prostitution that resulted from our involvement in Southeast Asia. Many
soldiers would use these women for their services without questioning the
morality of it, and at the same time viewed every single one of them as an
enemy. Deckard, of course, is starting to feel guilty about his job as an
executioner. He allowed himself to become acquainted with two androids and
realized he was goaded into a sham war. These androids are presented as
murderers of humans, but they’re only trying to make a living just as he is.
Aside from Polokov, he hadn’t had a violent encounter with the androids; they
had a more human respect for each other than Resch had for them. The androids
even value their own lives, not wanting to be put out of service; Resch,
however, almost seemed to accept his death if he’d tested positive for being an
android (Chapter 12, 60%). Deckard is disappointed to realize he’s of the same
kind as Resch; emotionally, he had more in common with Luba and Garland and
they’d presumably hurt nobody since coming to earth, while Resch had destroyed
two of them in one day.
In a manner
similar to how Americans grew to abhor the conflict in Vietnam, Deckard is
growing to detest those who goad him into killing. With the small amount of
time he’d put into getting to know Rachael Rosen, Luba Luft, and Garland,
nothing about them struck him as wrong aside from their failing of the Voight-Kampff
test. Additionally, there’s a major drawback to the test: it assumes that all
humans are followers of Mercerism. It only tests for their conditioned disgust
of animal products, not necessarily their level of empathy for those around
them. It can be seen as quite problematic how Phil Resch cares more for his
squirrel than a lifeform that looks just like his own species and possesses the
same level of intelligence and emotion. Deckard is coming to realize that
people aren’t evil for being different physically, but mentally. He loathes
that his job is to protect and serve people like Resch while pointlessly
killing innocents like Luba Luft.
If you’re
to assume the theory that Rick Deckard is in fact an android (which is what the
official conclusion in Blade Runner is, according to Ridley Scott), then this
shows that androids do in fact exhibit empathy for each other. If you assume Deckard
is a human, then we can conclude that being born human is not enough to make us
act human.
[1] Liukkonen, Petri.
"Philip K. Dick." Philip K. Dick., 2008,
http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/pkdick.htm
1 comment:
On both my kindle and my kindle app, I can get at the page numbers of this book. There may be a hardware issue here, but I'd suggest double-checking.
I've been giving people a hard time about similar arguments. Your variation has promise because you don't stay at a general level - you move immediately to Luba Luft, which is a good approach.
Your discussion of Resch and Luft and the contrast between them shows some attention to the nuances of the text, and a disinclination to move immediately into big conclusions. Good and good. "Aside from Polokov, he hadn’t had a violent encounter with the androids; they had a more human respect for each other than Resch had for them. The androids even value their own lives, not wanting to be put out of service; Resch, however, almost seemed to accept his death if he’d tested positive for being an android": this section is quite good, and shows the strengths of this essay. While I agree, though, that the androids show respect for each other, this is a good spot for at least a little evidence to that effect - your discussion of Luft, in particular, was purely individual.
"Additionally, there’s a major drawback to the test: it assumes that all humans are followers of Mercerism." It's always interesting to me (and illustrative of the need for literature classes) how few people think this far. Not many people pick up on the ways in which the novel is an ongoing critique of Deckard's values and assumptions. You handle that well.
The passing note about Bladerunner is fine, and could be expanded upon. A better conclusion for your argument, though, would have been to explain in more detail that the questioning of Deckard and his values at the heart of the novel should be read as a critique of the Vietnam War and its ideological apparatus. You're well on the way, but justifying that leap, while enhancing everything else, would provide plenty of work for a revision.
Post a Comment