Are the Women in Frankenstein Passive?
Reading the first half of
Frankenstein, it is almost immediately evident the passiveness of most of the
female characters. Another
thing that is evident is the portrayal of women as less important to the story it is almost as if they are disposable,
their opinions and actions are portrayed as less important than those of the
male characters. This story is filled with women who start off strong, but
suffer calmly in silence till it eventually leads to their demise. I find their
passiveness to be politically significant. In almost all instances, their
decision to be passive led to an important change in a situation. While also
being passive, they took a situation into their own hands, made a decision and
impacted the results of the situation.
Take for example Victors mother
Caroline Beaufort, her story starts off as her being a strong daughter, helping
her ailing father to survive by working hard and earning money, however once he
passes away she losses almost all her drive, allowing Alphonse Frankenstein to
swoop in and relieve her of all her stress and poverty. She goes from being a
strong and self-driven woman, to someone whose life only revolved about her
children, and in the end she losses her own life caring for one of them. While
I am not considering her actions to care for her ailing child, which in turn
led to her death to be passive, I believe that she lost a fire in herself once
her father passed away. Which led her to in turn loose her passion for her own
life.
Another example of a female
character that possesses passiveness is Justine Frantz. She also just like
Caroline starts off as a strong willed woman, with drive and resistance,
through all her family troubles, and tragedies, she persevered. However it only
takes one incident for Mary Shelley to display her to us readers as passive
When it comes to the murder of Victors brother William, she confesses to a
crime that she is innocent of, which in turn leads to her death. This passiveness
shows once again a woman who in previous chapter has stood up for herself, but
in the most important time when she needed to be strong she takes the passive
route, suffers calmly and willingly gives her life away. “I do not fear to
die,” she said; “that pang is in the past. God raises my weakness, and give me
courage to endure the worst… “Learn from me, dear lady, to submit in patience
to the will of Heaven!”
The last female character addressed
in the first half of Frankenstein who is also passive in many aspects of her
life is Elizabeth. She spends the first half of the book, waiting on every word
and beckoning of Victor, waiting on letters from him, waiting for his approval
or waiting for his guidance in everything she did. Although her character is
still developing in the few chapters we have read so far, I get a sense that as
the story progresses there will be more instances of her passiveness to come.
Although female characters in
Frankenstein are portrayed as passive, I sense that Mary Shelley is trying to
get a point across. I feel like there is a bigger picture that she is trying to
portray about women to her readers. I believe that beyond being passive, she
also portrays the female characters as also being self-less. I feel like based
on the era in which she wrote this book, where feminism was big, I think that
she will eventually use this negative characteristic to develop something
positive about the female characters, or women in general. Which brings me back
to the political significance of the passiveness amongst the female characters,
their passiveness is not based on their lack of knowledge, it is based on the
fact that they know that their reaction or lack thereof could have drastic
impacts on the situation, and they choose to decide the outcome by sacrificing their
life’s in some instance.
2 comments:
Let me note, first, that while your use of language is overall quite good, there are certainly places where better proofreading could have helped you. For instance "passivity" is correct, rather than "passiveness." You also sometimes connected clauses awkwardly at times - your use of semicolons and colons could be improved.
"I find their passiveness to be politically significant." This is an unusually astute first argument, although I'd like to see the exact (rather than general) political significance addressed from the start. I also very much like the observation that what seems to be passivity may actually be selflessness.
If you revise, you might use this connection between passivity and selflessness to *defend* the apparent passivity of some of the women more actively, or you might make the more political argument that they should not be selfless, at least not so universally selfless. In other words, you could dig deeper into the feminist or proto-feminist dimensions of the novel, by arguing that a questioning of passivity is also, at least in this case, a questioning of selflessness.
My main point, though, is that while your central insight is very good, your use of the text to investigate it is mixed. Rather than touching briefly on so many women, you might have done best with a more extended discussion of Caroline and Justine, for instance.
In a revision, I'd mostly be looking for a much more detailed use of the text throughout the novel, although I'd also hope for the argument to become more refined (and perhaps even political) itself.
Just got my cheque for $500.
Sometimes people don't believe me when I tell them about how much you can earn filling out paid surveys online...
So I show them a video of myself actually getting paid $500 for filling paid surveys to set the record straight once and for all.
Post a Comment