Android Symbolism in “Do
Androids Dream of Electric Sheep”
In “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep” it is clear
that the Philip K. Dick’s story is heavily influenced by what is happening in
America during the 1960’s. To fully understand the meaning and symbolism of
this book we must understand what is happening at the time Dick wrote this
novel. During the mid to late 1960’s America was a place of turmoil. The
country was war-torn, in the peak of action in the Vietnam War and in the midst
of the Cold War between the U.S.S.R. Along with that cold war came the constant
threat of nuclear warfare and communism. In this book, Dick uses symbolism to give
us social commentary on these topics and others.
Throughout the
story, there appears to be two forces fighting over the post-apocalyptic world
Dick has described to us. One is Mercerism, and the other is Buster Friendly.
This becomes apparent when Isodore says “Buster is the most important human
being alive, except of course Wilbur Mercer.” (Dick,69) More importantly these
two forces seem to be in direct competition. Isidore even goes on to say “I
think Buster Friendly and Mercerism are fighting over our souls.” (Dick, 76)
What could these two conflicting powers represent in
the time of Dick? To me these are the conflicting ideologies of Communism and
the American way of life. Mercerism is Dick’s version of communism and Buster
Friendly is the way of life America trusts and is used to. I feel like the
connection between Mercerism and Communism is a simple one to make. First, the original
name for Communism was Marxism. This is because the man who invented the idea
of Communism was named Karl Marx. Even though the idea of Communism is that all
are equal, it always ends up that one man controls all the power. Whether it is
Stalin in Russia, or Mercer in this book, the idea of togetherness is simply a façade
that is used to control the masses. Leaders of Communist regimes are often seen
as larger than life figures. They have giant murals of them on city walls and monuments
built for them. Mercer is described in this light when Isidore states “(Mercer)
isn’t a human being; he evidently is an archetypical entity from the stars, superimposed
on our culture by a cosmic template. (Dick, 74) Meanwhile, Buster Friendly is
the opposition to Communism, which was Patriotism. Although Communism is a
style of Government, it is not appropriate to say the opposition to Communism
was truly Democracy, because it was more than that. During the Red Scare, we
were not necessarily worried about the threat of a new government but more
about a new way of life. Communism was a threat to our freedom and our ability
to act for ourselves and think independently. To counter the Red Scare, the
United States engaged in propaganda equally is biased as the communists did.
Buster Friendly is very truly a propaganda machine. What I mean by this is that
he is an Android designed for essentially the sole purpose of stopping
Mercerism. We hear of his on page 74 when the narrator tells us that John would
become irritated when Friendly would “In subtle, almost inconspicuous ways, ridicule the empathy boxes.”
If Mercerism is Communism and Friendly is the United
States propaganda, what does that make the androids? To me the androids are the
Communists. Americans had an idea of what Communism was before the Red Scare.
These are the old non-threatening versions of the androids. However, when the
Nexus-6s androids emerged they became a threat because they were too life like
and too real. When Communism started to emerge in the US, there was a massive
panic. The government did everything they could to stop the spread throughout
the country. They were unfairly prosecuted and even hunted down. This is the
role of Rick Deckard. Rick is symbolic of a US government agent who is searching
and eliminating Communists. The hard part about being a US government ages in
this time that it was extremely difficult to identify Communists by simply
looking at them. This is why Dick goes to such great lengths about how lifelike
and realistic the Nexus-6s’s appear. Rick even tells us that he finds Rachael
Rosen, an android attractive. Also it is important to note that everyone taking
the Voight-Kampff test was thought to be a believer in Mercerism. My point is
furthered by the fact that when Luba Luff is being interviewed, she cannot
understand many of the questions. This could be analogous of a private
investigator interviewing a foreigner about being a communist.
If this is true, then why is the head of the proposed
US way of life an android? I think this is Dick’s way of saying that the US was
in a somewhat Communist state at this time. The fear created from paranoia and
propaganda caused and environment where its citizens had an over dramatized sense
of patriotism to the point where the accusations against communists or would be
communists were unfair.
In conclusion, Dick is making a strong statement about
the politics of the world in 1960. Through this story he is giving us a warning
through different symbols that if we do not change the way our society is run,
we will all die humans and androids alike.
1 comment:
I like that you start by grounding the novel in the 1960s. I don't like that you casually switch "metaphor" for "symbolism." It's not that it can't work, but "symbolism" tends to be a really loaded term, with rather different implications.
I love this line: "Buster Friendly is very truly a propaganda machine." What I don't love is that your argument throughout this long paragraph remains on such a general level. Clearly your argument that BF & Mercer stand for American nationalism vs. communism is defensible, but there are many, many roadblocks here. Critically, note that your symbol for American nationalism is exposing a christ-figure as a fraud, whereas Mercerism is a *religion*. Making Communism into a religion (when atheism was part of the official ideology) and American nationalism anti-religious (when, at least on a surface level, it tends to be closely aligned with more-or-less-evangelical Christianity) means that you have some challenges here. I'm not saying that you're wrong - I'm saying that you need to move from broad and problematic to specific and defensible claims - which is part of why I asked for a focus specifically on the androids, to be defended in detail through the text.
So the Androids are communists. Isn't it peculiar, then, that they have no access to Mercerism, which you claim is a metaphor for communism? Again, your idea isn't absurd - in fact, it is interesting - but you need to work through details here, rather than making very big, broad claims and avoiding a detailed defense made using the text itself.
Begin with the text, rather than the symbol. You do *use* the text here, but not in a way that actually defends your argument.
Post a Comment