Although many consider Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan, The Smartest Kid on Earth to be simply drawn, it
certainly is not fair to say that each and every panel does not hold any
importance. From the straight-forward art style to the frequently muted color palette,
everything that appears in the novel deliberately contributes to Ware’s
emphasis on the everyday aspects of despair throughout both Jimmy’s life and
that of his ancestors. In fact, it is this simplicity in graphical approach
that serves to further reinforce that the sources of the characters’
unhappiness are not fantastical, rather realistic and overtly “common”. A key
aspect of this sadness that is shown many times, at least in the case of Jimmy
himself, comes from his near inability to simply speak or interact with women,
which is exemplified in the short, yet revealing interaction between him and the
“Burger Kuntry” counter girl.
The
short sequence of ten panels concerns Jimmy attempting to get his father’s burger
replaced due to a mix-up to the fault of the female server. From the second
Jimmy attempts to speak to her, he becomes extremely flustered, which Ware
cleverly denotes by the emitting of hearts from Jimmy’s head as he tries to
think of something to say. By this point, the reader has already seen prime examples
of his inadequacies in interacting with women, such as his overly nervous and
meaningless phone call to Peggy, the office mail-lady and his implied “crush”,
and how he stares at the breasts of his neighboring flight passenger. This
example, although far more subtle, truly shows just how nervous women truly
make Jimmy, as the girl is able to completely paralyze his thoughts with nothing
other than meaningless banter regarding a botched burger order. Ware highlights
the meaninglessness of the conversation by quickly showing the creation of the
burger, consisting of nothing more than a frozen meat patty quickly cooked in
the microwave. The minute process that it requires is further made
insignificant by the excuse the girl makes, claiming she “sometimes… gets a
little… distracted,” even though the task truly should require no attention
towards it at all.
When
the girl finishes fixing the order, she tells Jimmy that he has to pay for it,
even though it was her mistake earlier. Even though he desperately tries to
speak out against paying for the meal twice, he locks up to the point where he
simply submits, and ends up paying double. This is exemplified through the
total lack of background within the panels that Jimmy contemplates challenging
the girl, showing a battle within himself to speak up rather than an external
conflict. When Jimmy finally submits to the additional payment, the background
of the restaurant returns, showing him snapping back into the reality that he
failed to stand up for himself, as well as speak to yet another woman. Although
he does not show it, the reader can infer that he is frustrated with himself
afterwards, as his dream in which he “walks out” on a mental representation of presumably
the same girl can be read as a justification to himself for his lack of
confidence and speech towards her behind the counter.
Another
aspect of the panels that speaks volumes towards Jimmy’s shortcomings with
women is the lack of the presence of the girl’s face. This is not a feature of
just this interaction, but nearly all of Jimmy’s other past and future)]
experiences with women throughout the graphic novel. Even Peggy, the woman that
he claims is his girlfriend when confronted by his father, never has her face
revealed. The lack of facial features can be read as a lack of importance in what
the women actually looks like, and an emphasis on Jimmy’s reactions, regardless
of features. By downplaying the physical representations of women (although
some characters crudely speak towards them), Jimmy’s desperate longing for
companionship and horrible social awkwardness become highlighted. The
obstruction of facial features can also be seen as a de-emphasizing any woman’s
true interest in Jimmy or importance to him, sexual or otherwise, in order to
make Jimmy’s despair in loneliness more apparent.
This
interaction between Jimmy and the “burger girl”, and all of Jimmy Corrigan in general, exemplifies the efficiency graphic novels
can hold in conveying content both through text and visual details. Through only
this short sequence of panels, Ware is able to accurately exemplify Jimmy’s
social and sexual failures, as well as set up for later examples that build
upon his simple inabilities to speak up for himself and talk to women. Still,
these aspects of Jimmy’s sadness are nothing abnormal to an everyday reader due
to realistic nature of both the subject matter as well as Ware’s efficient
illustration, making Jimmy’s situation all the more relatable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A visual reference to the panels in question:
2 comments:
Hi Carmen,
I enjoyed the points you made about how Ware blended Jimmy's social awkwardness into the actual comic panels. I liked how you connected the blandness of the panels with Jimmy's internal fight to speak up to the waitress. It was also an interesting point that all the women who make Jimmy nervous are drawn with limited facial illustrations. Your arguments that connected Jimmy's issues with socializing, was cleverly linked to his outlook on sexual experiences. Job well done.
Your intro is fundamentally good, although I'd urge you to consider the various moments (in the introduction, in the dreams, etc.) where various flights of fancy are incorporated into the more mundane whole of the book.
Your discussion of the interactions with the server/cashier/waitress are good. I especially liked what you had to say about the background/lack of background - it's a good exposition of how Jimmy's thoughts are represented through the technical details of Ware's execution.
I think, though, you conflate a lack of facial features with a lack of physical representations. One way to read this is that Jimmy is interested in women's bodies to the exclusion of their faces. Another way would be to argue that he can't even look in their faces (Nikki, I think, argued something along these lines).
By the end, I think you've done a good job explaining some technical details of the panels in question, and how thought and feeling can be represented through indirectly. At the same time, though, this is certainly one of your less ambitious essays - I'd like to see a little more about what you can *do* with this technical analysis, if only at the end. The repetitive nature of the conclusion - merely restating the presence of an efficiency which you've already proven - makes that point. You should be asking what you can do with your knowledge of that efficiency, having demonstrated it.
Post a Comment