Jimmy Corrigan: the Smartest Kid on Earth by Chris Ware sets
itself apart from other comic books by being so concerned with capturing the
felt life of a normal guy, opposed to the super-hero comics that focus on the exorbitant
adventures of the extremely gifted. One of those gifts often given to imagined
heroes is flight – perhaps no other comic book super-hero image is more
enduring that Superman: his arms extended, his chest puffed out, citizens below
staring up at the lively figure. Chris Ware inverts this image entirely in a
two-frame scene from the eyes of Jimmy Corrigan – in which a Superman-like
figure leaps to his death from a six-story building.
The image is beautiful and sad at the same time. A closer
look at the details of the image (no text appears on the page) illustrate
several themes that Ware explores throughout Jimmy Corrigan: isolation, the
journey through life, connection to other people, even sexual desires – all present
in the image.
First, it’s worth pointing out that when viewed out of
context, this image is everything that Jimmy Corrigan is not. From one frame to
the next, Superman is alive and then he is dead. That’s the same way it works
for all of us. (We are born) we are alive and then we are dead. But this view
is incredibly binary, and reductive of the power that life holds over all of
us. Jimmy Corrigan tells in beautiful detail all of the banal relationships,
experiences, dreams, anxieties that the main character goes through on his path
through the medium of life.
So putting this image into the context of the novel – in
which Jimmy met a Superman-actor early in his life, the mystery surrounding the
note that Jimmy just received (are those two, the actor and the note’s author,
one in the same?) – explains the narrative importance that this scene has to
the book.
But this scene is so powerful on its own that we don’t even
need to go beyond the page to see its thematic importance.
Only Jimmy saw the Superman leaping from the roof of the
building. Everyone on the ground only saw his body once it hit the ground. This
difference in perspective helps to explain some of the choices that Ware makes
in Jimmy Corrigan. In a world of imposed isolation (such as ours) sometimes we
don’t understand anyone’s story except our own. But sometimes, when we know
someone truly, we have a better understanding of where he/she comes from. In
this image no one on the ground knows that the Superman lifts his arms in the
first frame, looking like he’s ready to take flight. This makes us question if
it’s even a suicide, or a delusion, or some of both. No one knows except for
Jimmy and Chris Ware and the Superman.
Just like the reader gets nothing of the fall, there are no
gory details of what would likely happen to a man who just fell 6 stories to
his death. No classic THUMP! or WHAM! from the comic books, and no realistic splintered
bones, exploded skull, blood pools. Instead, this death is much more personal.
There are witnesses on the ground, who turn to look when the body hits the
ground, but a couple of frames later they are all gone, and the body remains.
The building that the Superman jumps from and every other one in sight is
completely empty.
On the inner cover of Jimmy Corrigan, Chris Ware discusses his
dilemma:
As such, the
thinking person should have to conclude that, in general, the seeking of
emotional empathy in art is essentially a fool-hardy pursuit, better left to
the intellectually weak, or the ugly, for they have nothing else with which to
occupy themselves. Besides, it is unsightly to feel sorry for oneself, and such
“unfortunate times” eventually pass, anyway, and if they don’t, then
mercifully, for the rest of us at least, suicide is, of course, an option.
Ware seems to emphasize (through
irony) his position as a “thinking person” opposed to the “intellectually weak.”
And through this image, too, Ware strikes the difficult balance between using
his art to empathetically portray the suicide of a character (itself an
all-too-common-easy-way-out literary tactic) from a position of delicacy and
mercy. Ware continues this attempt throughout Jimmy Corrigan – to take back the
art of everyday existence from the “intellectually weak” who would be tempted
to spend pages on the flailing fall, the gawking words of the people on the
ground, the continued distraction of the event that this man’s death became.
The Superman is the only person
in color in the scene. This is his personal choice, and Ware respects that.
Suicide doesn’t affect everyone, thankfully. But when it happens, the
experience lingers and colors life with a darker shade. I don’t think the theme
is finished in Jimmy Corrigan – but I can’t think of a much better handling of
the sensitive subject in any of my literary history.
1 comment:
Good introduction. Re: the 2nd paragraph, I'd point out that his obsessive interest in architecture is present here too.
The 3rd paragraph is startling. By this argument, there is a way in which the real subject matter of the book - all 350 pages or whatever - kind of takes place between this two frames. It's a smart observation, if you can make it work through attention to relevant details.
The best paragraph may be the one about JC's perspective. I like this when applied to these two frames (and I'd like to see what you have to say about similar frames, of that same building, at the end of the book - which is one possible starting point for a revision), but what this makes me want is, in some ways, a defense of JC's perspective. Curiously, if he is the only one to see the leap, there is some truth in the counterintuitive claim that he *is*, after all, special and smart - I'd like to see you think through this (whether you like my wording or not, I suspect you have something at least vaguely similar in the back of your mind).
You have a lot of smart things to say at the end of the essay, especially in your analysis of Ware's quote from the inside cover. I still feel some absences, which would offer ripe possibilities for revision.
What position (artistically? intellectually?) does Ware hold about suicide, or what view do you have in response to the book? What do Superman's splash of bright color in a drag world signify, especially given that it is paired with suicide? I agree that it's a good handling "of a sensitive subject", but the value of that handling presumably leads to a response on your part. What is that response? Simply expanding this essay to incorporate the whole book would be one critical strategy in a revision - pushing what you're trying to get from it farther would be the other critical component, I think.
Post a Comment