Androids as Metaphors
Brianna R. Pinckney
Do
Androids Dream of Electric Sheep is set in a post
apocalyptic future, where Earth and its populations have been damaged by a
nuclear war during World War Terminus. Due to the radiation most species were extinct
while most of mankind was left to begin life on another planet. Along with the
dying species something else is at risk of extinction; the empathy of humans is
tested as a new species invades their world. Androids were first introduced by
the government as a bribe to encourage humans to relocate to Mars after the
devastating effects of WWT, “Emigrate or degenerate! The choice is yours” (Page
8). The government hopes to persuade the idea that the only way to generate
society is to begin a new life on a foreign land. Contrary to their belief
forms of new life emerged on planet Earth. Before one can begin to note an
android’s significance, it is important to research the time period of when
Dick wrote the novel. It doesn’t take much to correlate the events that
occurred back then with some of the events in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep.
Philip K. Dick published DADES in the
late 1960’s, a pivotal moment in the United States during a cultural
revolution. The United States joined the Vietnam War as France’s ally as an
attempt to prevent the communist takeover of South Vietnam; this was part of a
larger strategy to stop the spread of communism. Between the fight for civil
rights, the nation struggling with the effects of the war, and other related
cultural influences the 1960’s strayed further and further away from President
Johnson’s goal of becoming a “Great Society”. The war divided the nation and
was followed by a mixture of empowerment and polarization, resentment and
liberation leaving a permanent mark on America’s political and cultural
history. One of the main critiques of capitalism during this period was the
belief that America’s own capitalistic hunger only fueled the machines of war
that sprung up all over the world during this time, specifically in Vietnam.
Through this novel, Dick claims that those who’ve propagated violence on others
have just as much responsibility for the economic and social conditions of the
world as do those that they fight. Dick
uses forces in the book such as Buster and Mercisim as symbols representing two
opposing teams fighting each other. The people must choose a side, shows
separation.
Isidore
even goes on to say “I think Buster Friendly and Mercerism are fighting over
our souls.” (Page 76) This theory correlates to the heavy use
and talk about empathy.
On an earth ravaged by nuclear war, life in any form
becomes sacred. Replicate animals become a status symbol for their owners while
real animals are owned by only the richest people. This compassion and
emotional connection towards animal life becomes the only way to separate the
humans from the androids. Dick is suggesting that this trait defines our
existence as humans. Without the ability to love and value life humans are
incapable of living. “You have to be with other people, he thought. In order to
live at all. I mean before they came here I could stand it... But now it has
changed. You can't go back, he thought. You can't go from people to
nonpeople." - J.R. Isidore” Philip K. Dick had a life-long fascination and
love for animals. This element of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep
reflects his vision of a world where animals are respected like humans, maybe
more.
Empathy
is the main theme of the novel and is the root on which Dick's metaphysical
reflection on the meaning of life hangs. Characters such as Deckard, Isidor,
Luba Luft and Phil
Resch
all encounter situations where they must relate to empathy based on past
personal experiences. Androids pose fear to humans because their existence
forces human kind to define its species. Humans are threatened when they are
faced with the question, what qualities define them as humans? Or even a more
specific question, how do intellectual and emotional responses to nature relate
to the concept of humanity? While Rick Deckard reflects he decides "...ultimately,
the empathic gift blurred the boundaries between hunter and victim, between the
successful and the defeated" (Page 31). In this quote, Deckard ponders the
vague lines drawn between the creatures that are empathetic and those who do
not have such ability. One of the novel’s major themes revolves around the
question of which traits make something human and which traits ensures survival
or defeat. An example of where a character’s empathy level is tested arises
when Rick Deckard is preparing to administer the test on Phil Resch. Deckard has a
preconceived notion that Resch is an android due to the fact that Resch is able
to kill so coldly without a second thought of his empty conscious. "If I
test out android, you'll undergo renewed faith in the human race. But since
it's not going to work out that way, I suggest you begin framing an ideology
which will account for-" (Page 140).
This quote, spoken to Rick by the bounty hunter Phil Resch, is said just
before Rick administers a test on Phil. If he is, this will validate Rick’s
belief that androids have no understanding for life and can become completely
closed off from all human emotion. However, as Rick later discovers, humans are
cable of this same ability, blurring the distinguished lines between what is a
true human and what is not.
In
order to emphasize with another, one must first recognize the emotion that is
being presented in front of them. This initial step of identifying another’s
emotional content is essential for later phases like relating to another or
showing compassion towards another because neither can be reached without the
initial emotional recognition. The theory of androids not caring for other
androids is discussed when Deckard approaches Luba Luft to administer the
Voigt-Kampff personality-profile test, “An android doesn’t care what happens to
another android. That’s one of the indications we look for" (Page 101). This
quote is ironic because, as it turns out, some androids actually do care what
happens to other androids, sometimes even more than human life. Supposedly,
artificial bonds kept the Nexus-6 androids together and allowed them to fear
for the safety of one another. Ultimately, if androids do care for other
androids, it becomes nearly impossible to tell who is really an android and who
is not, just another of Dick’s twists on logic.
These
natural emotions are the basis of humanity and the reader gets a glimpse at its
control during Isidore’s dilemma with the dying cat. After failing to realize
that cat was real, Isidore faced not only his own horror at having let an
animal die but now he is also required to alert the animal’s owner. It’s
assumed that the cat’s owner would be more horrified at the cat’s passing
however the owner decides to have an android created so their spouse won’t be
too disturbed by the absence of their cat. Here, Dick is calling into question
the value of life and how easily humanity substitutes loss with some kind of
replacement.
"Do androids
dream?" (Page 182). This quote
reflects the title of the book and the basic philosophical question that the
book asks: what qualities and traits make one human. Roy Baty, Rick's shadow
character, seems to have just as many dreams as Rick has himself. The dreams
consist of aspirations for a better life and for the ability to one day have
spiritual fusion with Mercer. Baty’s character shows the same traits and
motivations as Deckard. It’s interesting to come across an android that hopes
for life improvement, similarly to how humans rely on dreams and even their
religion to one day improve their current situation.
Although he still does
not have a complete definition of what it means to be human by the end of the
novel, Rick Deckard has accepted his emotions and gained a great deal of
empathy for fellow life. He realizes he is in fact a human and knows that he
can continue on and eventually find the solutions to his theories. His position
has gone through some changes but his attitude toward life has changed for the
better dramatically.
Sources:
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, A Del Rey Book Published by
The Random House Publishing Group, Copyright 1968 by Phillip K. Dick
http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~felluga/reviewBender.html
, Dan Bender
1 comment:
I like the idea that empathy is almost extinct in the novel (although the characters would claim almost the opposite). That, in itself, would make a very interesting argument. I'm not sure that your *actual* focus is as good as this *possible* focus.
I'm happy to see you write, even if rather vaguely, about the widespread belief that the war was fueled by greed. The material to connect that to the novel is there, if you choose to pursue it. You are tending to keep your argument on a very general (easy?) level, though, rather than diving deeper into the text. Hint: the early pages of the novel discuss the Rand corporation, which would be the perfect beginning to talking about how DADES is concerned with the role of greed in the Vietnam war.
The paragraph beginning "empathy is the main theme" has excellent, excellent details (Your reading of Resch is good; your discussion of Deckard's interest in predatory and prey is a theme, unexplored by the rest of the class, that resonates richly through the novel). But the details are rather disconnected from one another, and have nothing (that I can see) to do with your ostensible topic of the Vietnam war. Similarly, your discussion of the irony of looking for lack of concern for other androids is excellent but also rootless - what is this doing in the essay as a whole?
Your discussion of Roy Baty and dreaming is good, too, but is disconnected from everything - it has nothing to do with Vietnam (maybe you could make it work, but you sure aren't trying yet) and nothing to do with your discussion of empathy, either.
Overall: Many of the details of very good, but the whole doesn't work together. Almost all of your individual details - predator & prey, Baty's dreams, the idea that empathy is extinct could lead to an interesting and focused essay, but you're not doing that. Instead of making a single, focused claim, you jump from idea to idea, only barely connecting them. The whole is much less than the sum of the parts in this one.
Note: weak research
Post a Comment