Androids
as a Metaphor
The 1960’s were a time
of great triumph and also great defeat for America. The 1960’s saw huge
achievements in technology but, the Vietnam and Cold Wars were both in full
effect in the 60’s (Oxford). In 19608,
Philip K. Dick wrote “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep” and in this novel there
are clear metaphors with many things happening in society at that time period. Some
examples of this include the empathy boxes, chicken heads, life on Mars, and
life on Earth. These are metaphors for drugs, disabled persons, and the rich
and poor people respectfully. It is clear that there are many metaphors in the
novel but perhaps the most important metaphor that Dick makes is about the
androids. The androids are a metaphor for the
lack of empathy that many believed characterized America's leaders during their involvement in
the Vietnam War. More specifically, the androids are a metaphor for the
government officials who were in office making all of the decisions during the
Vietnam War.
Philip
K. Dick was a brilliant man, he graduated high school and attended the University
of California-Berkeley but he dropped out after only one year (Philip K. Dick).
However, Dick’s studies did not end there; he continued on his own and after a
short time became a writer. Dick tried to write mainstream fiction but after having
little success he soon went on to become a very successful science fiction
writer (Philip K. Dick). The fact that Dick had trouble writing mainstream is
very appropriate with the theme of his life of always being in the
counterculture. In fact during the Vietnam War, he protested by
placing his name on the “Writers and Editors War Tax Protest” pledge, vowing
not to pay taxes in protest of the ongoing conflict (Philip K. Dick).
Knowing who Dick was as a person helps make the metaphors he makes in DADES
clear to the reader.
In
DADES, Dick illustrates a world in 2021, World War Terminus has ended but not
until it killed millions of people. The survivors are forced to make a
decision, go live on Mars or continue life on Earth. The androids first come
into the picture as inventions to be servants for families on Mars, but through
time androids are developed by the Rosen Association to become more and more
like humans. The androids, especially the Nexus-6 model are identical to human
beings in just about every way imaginable. The androids are able to speak, eat,
work, have sex, for their own societies, and just completely blend into society
on Earth. However, androids lack one important aspect that humans have; empathy.
Empathy or the lack of emotions is the only difference between humans and
androids. In DADES the main character, Rick Deckard is a bounty hunter in
charge of killing the escaped androids on Earth. Deckard searches for and tests
androids to see their levels of empathy, and if they are too low he eliminates
the android. This emotionless sense is
what the people against the Vietnam War believed the Vietnam supporters were
like. The emotionless sense in the androids is not the only connection between
them and government officials however. The connection that the androids were in
control of society similar to the government officials can also be made.
In
order to make the argument that the androids are actually in control of society
some characters need to be analyzed. One character that stands out in DADES is
Buster Friendly. Buster Friendly one of the most well-known figures on Earth,
he runs a television show that just about everyone tunes into to watch on a daily
basis. Through his humor and rhetoric, Buster Friendly shares news and brings
guests on to his show to talk about a variety of things for days and even weeks
at a time. Not only does Buster Friendly run a television show, but he also is
in charge of a radio station where he is able to communicate with people when
they are not in front of their televisions. Both the television channel and radio
station run for twenty three hours a day, which means that Buster Friendly
broadcasts for forty six hours each and every day. Forty six hours where nearly
every person on Earth listens to him for a period of time, allowing buster to
have a huge impact in society. Society allows for this to happen because they
look at Buster Friendly as a god like figure, they look to him for hope, and
they believe everything that he says. This is very similar to how people view
the president of the United States and other prominent government officials.
But, where there are many supporters for Buster Friendly, there are also some skeptics,
and these people have another character to look to for guidance. Wilbur Mercer
is the other prominent leader in DADES. Mercer is the leader of Mercerism, which is the idea that everyone must work
together to climb a hill and reach the top. This goal is said to be in the
interest of feeling empathy towards all people and will better the society as a
whole. When someone reaches the top of the hill however, all that happens is
that they get start over climb the hill all over again. This goal is contrived,
in an infinite loop, and seems to have no practical benefit to its participants
but Mercer is able to use it as his tool to control society. The only way to
access Mercer is through an empathy box which everyone, even the chicken heads
own. This means that Mercer too can be reached at any point of the day for any
desired length.
Throughout
DADES there is little to no competition between Buster Friendly and Mercer
until the ending of the novel when Buster Friendly announces his big news.
Buster Friendly states and he has the information to back it up that, “Mercerism
is a swindle!” (Dick 209). This comes as a shock to the world and undoubtedly
leads people to favor Buster Friendly over Wilbur Mercer. The fact that Buster
Friendly proves Mercer is a fake is a huge gain for the androids. This is because
some people start to catch on to what Buster Friendly really is. In fact,
characters such as Mr. Sloat and JR Isidore state, “Buster is immortal…it’s
true. They’ve never admitted it, of course” (Dick 76). Now that it is known
that Buster Friendly is an android and that he proved Mercer a fake shows how
much power not only he but the androids as a group have over the human society
on Earth. The androids have similar power over society as the government
officials did over the American society during the Vietnam War.
Similarly
to how the androids had control over society in DADES; the United States
government officials were using their own powers to control the U.S.
population. The government used propaganda to promote the Vietnam War similar
to how Buster Friendly used his programs. The government also went to war in
order to eliminate the spread of communism across the world. A connection can
be made between Buster Friendly eliminating Mercerism and the United States
government eliminating communism. When looking at the details, the similarities
are quite startling and it is amazing how Philip K. Dick could incorporate
these metaphors into DADES.
Dick a member of the
antiwar movement himself clearly believed that the Vietnam supporters especially
the government officials were in complete control of society, just as the
androids are in DADES. Dick does a phenomenal job in making metaphors out of many
things in society during the 1960’s. It is clear that this book has a deeper
meaning than what appears in the text. As the androids become more like humans,
they are able to take over the leadership roles in society. However, they lack
empathy making them very similar to the government officials during the Vietnam
War. Overall, as Dick writes DADES, in a very unique way. He makes just about
every object a metaphor for something in that current time period and the most prevent
metaphor is the androids as empathy lacking corrupt government officials.
Works
Cited
Dick, Philip K., and Philip
K. Dick. Do Androids Dream of
Electric Sheep? New York:
Ballantine, 1996. Print.
Oxford, Tasmin. "6
Technologies to Thank the 1960s for." TechRadar.
TechRadar, 17 Nov. 2009. Web. 18 Sept. 2013.
"Philip K. Dick -
Biography." Philip K. Dick. The
European Graduate School, n.d. Web. 01 Oct. 2013.
1 comment:
I feel like the 1st paragraph could be trimmed down. However, your thesis is interesting, focused and clear. Good.
The 2nd paragraph is a little shallow. Touching on his opposition to the war is good, but there's not a whole lot of substance here.
The 3rd paragraph has a bunch of plot summary which could have been trimmed, then we get this out of left field: "Deckard searches for and tests androids to see their levels of empathy, and if they are too low he eliminates the android. This emotionless sense is what the people against the Vietnam War believed the Vietnam supporters were like."
This is a *huge* leap to make. Hopefully this is operating more as a second thesis than as an actual assertion of fact - this is not the sort of idea which you can just assert and then move on.
Your long summary of BF and Mercer has some interesting moments, but it would work better if you clarified your argument throughout, and split it up into paragraphs on particular topics. I like the idea of Mercer controlling the society through endless repetition, but you really need to do something with the seemingly contradictory idea that both BF and Mercer represent power and/or the state.
Your claim about Buster & Mercer is much like your previous big claim: "Now that it is known that Buster Friendly is an android and that he proved Mercer a fake shows how much power not only he but the androids as a group have over the human society on Earth. The androids have similar power over society as the government officials did over the American society during the Vietnam War." First, we have the contradictory ideas that Mercerism has been defeated and that its defeat is totally insignificant - remember that Mercer, Isidore, and maybe Deckard see things differently from the Androids here. Second, your argument that the US government during the Vietnam War was similar is totally unfounded - it's simply an assertion, and given that this was a time of massive unrest within the U.S., it doesn't even make a whole lot of sense. You need to say something articulate here about, say, LBJ or Nixon, rather than just ignoring the hard part of the argument.
The Mercerism = Communism idea is fine, and could be a topic for an essay in itself. You don't develop it, though.
Overall: This essay has a lot of plot summary. Amidst the plot summary, you make a couple big claims, but offer no actual evidence to support them. You need to focus on getting to your focused argument as quickly as possible, then demonstrating it. Here, you do everything *but* defend your actual argument.
Post a Comment